Google+
Home > Storage, Technology > HP’s RAID 6 (ADG – Advanced Data Guarding)

HP’s RAID 6 (ADG – Advanced Data Guarding)


Continuing my RAID 6 posts, first HDS’s RAID 6, then NetApp’s RAID-DP and now this time around it’s HP’s RAID-6 ADG.

Some upcoming post would include RAID 6 Technology and its implementation by SUN, IBM and EMC. The final post should be about a comparison of all OEM products and the usage of RAID 6.

Here are the links to previous post related to RAID 6 and data protection

NetApp’s RAID–DP

Hitachi’s (HDS) RAID 6

Different RAID Technologies (Detailed)

Different RAID Types


Will try to keep this post short in terms of overall RAID 6 concepts, rather jump directly into the technical aspects of HP’s RAID-6 ADG (Advanced Data Guarding).

HP’s Business Case with RAID-6 Advanced Data Guarding (ADG)

So Advanced Data Guarding….the name is just perfect…. HP’s pitch to their potential storage customers would include a slide on ADG (I am a
ssuming that is the case).
This cost effective and fault tolerant technology is proprietary to HP and its patented, just cannot find a reference about it on the US PTO’s website.


RAID-6 ADG is supported on the MSA (Modular Smart Arrays) SAN platform.


I believe it’s not supported on any EVA (Enterprise Virtual Array) platforms. No RAID 6 support available on LeftHand Network SAN’s.


With HP XP-24000, HP XP-20000, HP XP-12000 and HP-XP 10000 there is no support for RAID-6 ADG, but there is native support for RAID 6 (dual parity).


HP Storage Products traditionally have support for RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 1+0, RAID 5 and now RAID-6 ADG. Some LeftHand Network SAN’s support RAID 3 and RAID 4.


The argument from HP is pretty similar to the ones we already discussed with HDS and NetApp in the previous post. The push for RAID 6 at HP comes due to the existence of larger disk size and requirements for fault tolerance to run 24 x 7 x 365 applications.


Since there is an additional parity calculation associated with RAID-6, HP’s recommendation is to use RAID-6 ADG with lower writes and high reads only. If you have an application performing random writes, RAID 6 (ADG) might not be an option for you.


HP’s RAID-6 Advanced Data Guarding (ADG) Technology

Here is a snapshot of how this technology operates.



In the case here, we have 6 disk drives attached on a fiber loop or SCSI bus / controller. Data is striped on Disk 1, Disk 2, Disk 3, Disk 4 and then Parity (P1) and (Q1) are generated and written on Disk 5 and Disk 6. You can assume each data block is 4kb or 8kb in size.

Similarly, as the process continues, the next set of data strips start at Disk 1 then go to Disk 2, Disk 3 and Disk 6, while the parity is written on Disk 4 (P) and Disk 5 (Q). ADG is based on P + Q algorithm to calculate two independent parity sets. Exclusive OR (XOR) is used to calculate the P and Q Parity. The P Parity is exactly like it would be for RAID 5 and Q is calculated based on Error Correcting Code. The Q is then striped across all the disk within the RAID Group.

If a single drive is lost in the Raid Group, data is rebuild using ordinary XOR P (Parity). Also the P and Q are both recalculated for each rebuild block. If a second drive fails during this time, the rebuild takes place using the Q Parity. During these times data is still completely available with a little degradation.

If you do add a spare drive to this configuration, now your raid group can pretty much withstand 3 drive failures before data loss.

This technology can be implemented with a minimum of 4 drives. The overhead with use of 4 drives in a single RAID Group is 50%. If you run 60 drives in a single RAID group, your overhead might be close to 4% {100 – [100 x 2 (parity) / 60 (drives)]}.

The formula to calculate your usable space will be C * (n – 2), where C is the Size of your smallest drive in the RAID Group and n = number of drives. It is highly recommended all your disk drive sizes are similar.

If you are running more than 14 physical drives in a single RAID Group, HP’s recommendation is to use RAID-6 ADG. With 6 drives in a RAID Group, the failure probability is 1E-10. With 60 drives in a RAID Group, the failure probability is 1E-7.

Again HP’s big pitch with RAID-6 ADG is Cost Effectiveness with Fault Tolerance, not really performance.